🔗 Share this article Relatives' Heartache Over Shoreline Erosion Threatening Norfolk Graves Families of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones. An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations. A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed. “At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.” Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said. Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard. “You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.” A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated. “It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.” In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.” Seeking Solutions and Clarity An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious. Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near. “The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.” A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.” It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.” “Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.” The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.