🔗 Share this article

Turns out he endured defeat by Grimsby. Survive a decisive continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering the team's best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. By masterfully outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “will be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into the Champions League and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for using excessively that system. Hire the project manager and then bin him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.